Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
House Ag Committee hears mixed testimony on bill to restrict drones over animal feeding operations
Summary
A House Agriculture Committee hearing on House Bill 1429 drew farmers, industry groups and drone advocates to debate whether state law should restrict drones over animal feeding operations (AFOs). Supporters cited privacy and animal-safety concerns; opponents warned of federal preemption, vagueness and harm to commerce and innovation.
A House Agriculture Committee hearing on House Bill 1429 opened with sponsor Representative Dawson Holly describing incidents and farmer concerns that drove the proposal to restrict drones over animal feeding operations.
The bill, modeled on an Iowa law, would limit unauthorized drone flights over farms and large animal facilities and exempt government entities; Holly said the measure aims to protect private property and animals from intrusive or reckless drone operations.
The bill drew broad testimony from agriculture groups and farmers who said drones have been used by activists to record farm operations and that buzzing or errant aircraft can frighten animals and cause injury. Pete Hanabit of the North Dakota Farm Bureau and Julie Ellingson of the North Dakota Stockmen’s Association said their organizations support protections against unauthorized surveillance and animal harassment. Hanabit told the committee Farm Bureau policy already addresses unauthorized surveillance and that the bill fits that policy. Ellingson said the bill’s concept is to balance property rights,…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
