Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Delegates debate speed-camera expansion, revenue use and a proposal to fund school deferred maintenance
Summary
HOCO 925, which would authorize speed-monitoring cameras on high-risk roadways and direct excess revenues toward specific uses, drew extended debate over camera type, revenue nexus and proposed amendments to dedicate funds for school deferred maintenance.
Delegates spent a prolonged portion of the meeting discussing HOCO 925, a bill that would authorize local use of automated speed monitoring systems on high-risk roadways and — in amendments offered during the session — allocate some revenue for school deferred maintenance.
Delegate Hill, the bill sponsor, said the proposal expands local authority to use speed cameras in areas identified by the county or in the state’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (Vision Zero) and along Route 1. "If we're worrying about speed in this or other areas of the county where safety is an issue... we should also follow the leads of Montgomery, Baltimore, and Prince George's County and enable the local jurisdiction to use speed cameras," she said.
An amendment from Delegate Feldmark (read by counsel during the meeting) would direct any balance remaining from speed-camera fines after program costs to a deferred maintenance fund for Howard County Public Schools. Another amendment proposed folding revenues from existing mobile school-zone cameras together with revenue from new fixed-site cameras and allowing that combined revenue to be used for pedestrian or highway safety programs or deferred maintenance.
Members questioned the administration about implementation details: Maureen Evans of the county administration said she had circulated preliminary answers from Howard County Police Department and asked for a follow-up meeting with transportation and police staff to provide full technical responses. HCPD responses (read into the record and provided by county staff) said revenues from Howard County automated enforcement sites are remitted directly to Howard County and that speed cameras have been shown to reduce speeding in deployed areas. The department noted most pedestrian collisions they investigated were attributed to pedestrian error, though a 2024 fatality involved excessive speed.
Delegates raised operational questions: whether the bill envisions fixed, permanent cameras or continued use of mobile systems; how camera program revenues would be tracked; what the geographic radius of school zones and camera authority should be; and whether revenues from a program likely to reduce violations over time are a reliable funding source. Several delegates asked the county to supply maps of candidate roadways, historical revenue from existing school-zone cameras, and projections.
No final vote was taken on HOCO 925 at the session; members agreed to continue discussion at the next meeting after the county provides additional technical data, revenue figures and maps.
