Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vector Control Committee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council punts vector control committee after no applicants; staff to return with alternate meeting times or reassignment
Summary
No applications were received for Yucaipa’s Vector Control Committee. The council directed staff to reopen recruitment with alternate meeting times and, if recruitment remains poor, to provide options including making the committee ad hoc or assigning duties to the Planning Commission.
Get email alerts on the Vector Control Committee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Yucaipa City Council on Jan. 21 discussed the lack of applicants to the Vector Control Committee and directed staff to return with options to increase participation.
City Clerk staff reported that no applications were submitted for the Vector Control Committee. Council members and staff said the committee’s prior 4 p.m. meeting time made it difficult for potential volunteers who work outside Yucaipa to participate. Mayor Pro Tem Venable said moving the meeting time later could increase participation.
City staff offered two options to the council: reopen recruitment with revised meeting times or reassign vector-control responsibilities to an existing commission (the Planning Commission was specifically mentioned as a practical alternative because its members already receive city training and understand procedures). Staff also suggested converting vector control to an ad hoc committee that would meet only as issues arise.
Council Member discussion: Council Member Woolsey and others noted vector problems have historically been episodic — e.g., localized fly issues — and that standing meetings frequently lasted only 20 minutes when no violations were reported. Council consensus favored giving staff time to recruit with alternate meeting times; if recruitment proves unsuccessful, staff will return with the option to assign oversight to the Planning Commission or form an ad hoc committee.
Action: Council moved and seconded a request directing staff to propose adjusted meeting times and to report back with recruitment results and a fallback option to reassign duties; the motion passed on the record.
Why it matters: Vector control oversight can become a public-health issue if infestations or disease-vector trends re-emerge. The council sought a practical approach that balances community participation with efficient use of staff and volunteer time.
Ending: Staff will bring back a recruitment update and proposed times; if recruitment remains insufficient the council may reassign vector-control duties to an existing commission or establish an ad hoc response group.

