Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appellate panel hears dispute over suppression of Ronald Andrew Archie’s cell‑phone data

2150610 · January 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Attorneys for the State and the defense argued whether a trial court erred in suppressing cell‑phone data collected under a search warrant in the murder prosecution of Ronald Andrew Archie; the court took the case under advisement.

At an appellate oral argument, attorneys for the State of Tennessee and for defendant Ronald Andrew Archie debated whether a trial judge wrongly suppressed cell‑phone data seized under a search warrant in a murder prosecution. The panel heard competing legal theories on probable cause and on whether the so‑called Leon good‑faith exception should allow admission of the seized data; the court took the case under advisement.

The State, represented at argument by Alan Gross, urged reversal of the suppression order. Gross told the court that the magistrate’s finding of probable cause should be assessed on the “totality of the circumstances” and summarized four categories of factual allegations in the affidavit: the timing of Archie's phone use around the murders, the defendant’s girlfriend’s apparent deception about his phone use, evidence suggesting the involvement of at least two accomplices, and the affiant…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans