Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears detailed special-education cost analysis; district sees fluctuating outplacement and reimbursement pressures
Summary
District staff presented data showing year-to-year flux in out-of-district placements, the financial effect of students returning to district programs, and how state reimbursement thresholds and rates affect net costs.
Southington School District staff presented a granular analysis of special-education outplacement, students returned to district programs, and the budgetary implications for the 2023'24 and 2024'25 school years.
Dr. Cavallaro introduced the follow-up report on Jan. 23, saying the question the board posed at a previous workshop—how many outplaced students returned and what that saved—has multiple layers. The presentation distinguished three groups: students who returned from outplacement to district programs, students newly outplaced during the year, and students who remained in district who otherwise would have been outplaced.
Key figures presented: seven students returned to district programs for 2024'25 whose outplacement tuition in 2023'24 totaled $511,970; of that amount $94,489 exceeded the state's excess-cost threshold (4.5 times the per-pupil amount), and at a 69.06% reimbursement rate those excess costs would generate approximately $65,268 in state revenue. The staff also reported 27 total outplacements during 2023'24; five of those students moved into the district already carrying an outplacement IEP from their sending districts.
Staff also quantified the in-district placements that likely avoided outplacement. Sixteen students who were served in district programs in 2023'24 would otherwise have required outplacement; the estimated tuition cost for those placements, had they been outplaced, was about $1,434,369 and the corresponding estimated excess-cost reimbursement at the stated rate was $339,765. The presentation excluded transportation costs because bids and rates vary widely year to year; staff said transportation would add materially to outplacement totals but is highly variable.
The discussion highlighted other fiscal drivers: a recent law change extending services for some students to age 22 increased costs beyond what the district had anticipated; staff also noted the district's excess-cost reimbursement percentage has fallen in recent runs (69.06% cited in analysis versus a later run of about 62%). Board members asked for supplemental figures the staff said they could provide, including the effect of a hypothetical 100% reimbursement rate on the current budget and line-item details behind the highest-cost outplacements.
Staff said homebound instruction (tutoring for medically fragile or temporarily excluded students) costs roughly $15,000 per year per student when provided for the full school year. They also explained how in-district unit-cost calculations are derived: the district divides classroom costs (teacher salary, paras, related services) by the number of students in that classroom to compute per-student costs submitted to the state for excess-cost reimbursement.
Board members and staff agreed the special-education area is volatile and that maintaining or expanding in-district programs can reduce tuition outlays, but that unpredictable moves into the district and rare, high-cost placements will continue to create budget uncertainty. Staff said they would provide additional breakdowns on the largest outplacement tuition figures and the potential savings under a 100% reimbursement scenario.
