Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Los Angeles council debates new disclosure rules for independent campaign spending; council asks city attorney for broader ordinance
Summary
The Los Angeles City Council debated two Ethics Commission–backed disclosure ordinances on April 27 that would require faster reporting of certain independent expenditures and communications directed at members of organizations, with councilmembers sharply divided over whether to change rules during an ongoing election.
The Los Angeles City Council spent a prolonged session on April 27 debating two ordinances from the City Ethics Commission that would require new, faster disclosure of some independent campaign expenditures and of paid communications sent by organizations to their members.
The proposals, presented by Ethics Commission Executive Director Leanne Pelham and Commission President Miriam Krinsky, were written to restore disclosure the commission says was removed by changes in state law (Proposition 34) and to preserve parts of the city’s matching-funds system that depend on knowing the scale and source of outside spending.
Why it matters: Council staff and reform advocates said voters should know, before the June runoff, who is paying for ads and prerecorded phone calls that influence elections. Opponents said changing rules in the middle of an election is unfair and risks politicizing enforcement.
What the commission proposed and why Leanne Pelham told the council the ordinances would require organizations that pay to communicate with their members in support of or opposition to city candidates to report those payments and the sources of…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

