Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Bill to add due-process rules for no-trespass orders draws wide committee scrutiny

2148881 · January 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative Juliet Harvey Bouley proposed House Bill 143 to introduce formal appeal rights and clearer limits on no-trespass orders for public municipal and school property; witnesses and committee members debated emergency temporary orders, unanimity thresholds, and differences between property types such as schools and libraries.

Representative Juliet Harvey Bouley opened testimony on House Bill 143 by describing cases where parents and members of the public received indefinite no-trespass orders on public property and later raised constitutional challenges. "This bill addresses how municipalities and towns address no trespass orders on public property, not private property," Bouley said, adding that the measure seeks to establish an appeal process and more specific limits on duration and scope.

Bouley cited a 2014 case involving a man outside a Nashua library, saying the court found his 14th Amendment rights were violated because there had been no opportunity to contest a verbal order and no end date was given. The bill would require a governing body to vote — in the language presented, unanimously — before an order takes effect and would guarantee the subject a hearing…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans