Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews special education staffing, child-count trends and plans for a program review
Summary
Trustees discussed rising special education caseloads, unfilled positions earlier in the year, the district’s extraordinary-reimbursement expectations and an independent review of special education cost and quality.
Board members reviewed a quarterly special education staffing and child-count report and asked for more analysis of staffing needs and costs.
Administrators and board members noted that while overall district enrollment has declined in recent years, the number of students identified for special education has increased. ‘‘We have a 120 more students than we did 9 years ago who require additional services,’’ a board member observed, linking higher per‑pupil service needs to higher spending. The superintendent said the district currently spends at a high level and is the seventh‑highest special‑education spender in Vermont.
The board discussed vacancies reported at the end of the prior fiscal year and actions taken during the year. The superintendent said some positions were converted to contracted services where hires were not available and that payroll encumbrances change as vacancies are filled. She reported that the district is down to about eight open special‑education positions and that a consultant will perform a special‑education review covering both cost and program quality.
On funding, the business manager explained extraordinary special‑education reimbursement: the district budgets expected extraordinary reimbursement based on students whose out‑of‑district or high‑cost placements exceed the statutory threshold for extraordinary reimbursement. The administration projected approximately $3.2 million in extraordinary reimbursement for the current fiscal year and estimated $3.5 million for the next year (estimates subject to final state calculations and changes in placements).
Board members asked for additional detail in future reports: quarterly (not calendar) child‑count and staffing snapshots, clarifications of where funds previously budgeted for vacant positions were carried in the year‑end accounting, and a staffing‑needs analysis with recommended caseload targets. The superintendent said the upcoming special‑education review will provide recommendations on staffing levels, caseload norms and cost controls.
No motions were taken; the board directed administration to return with the special‑education review findings and a staffing/cost recommendation.
