Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Centers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

NAACP and residents push for community center in Lexington Park, collect petitions

2148147 · January 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

NAACP St. Mary's County and several residents urged commissioners to support creating a community or recreational center in Lexington Park; organizers said they formed a steering committee and collected more than 200 petition signatures in under a week.

Representatives of the NAACP St. Mary’s County and other residents urged the commissioners on Sept. 1 to support a community center in Lexington Park and to prioritize facilities and programming for youth.

Roderick Lewis, speaking for the NAACP St. Mary’s County, said the organization convened a community meeting the previous Thursday, formed a steering committee to lead an effort to obtain a community center, and planned to produce a proposal for the commissioners. “We do have a petition that we've started…we've already collected 200 over 200 signatures. That's less than a week,” Lewis said.

Shamia Bowers, a Lexington Park resident, said she supported the NAACP effort and described local youth needs and the unused teen center on Chancellor’s Run Road. “As I attend a lot of meetings in the community, I hear a lot of ‘we need a center,’” Bowers said, and she encouraged ongoing organizing.

Alfonso Gasket, a county native who spoke about recreation facilities, said the southern end of the county has particular need and urged the commissioners to allocate funds and allow community-driven programming. He said there was disagreement with a commissioner over location — he favored Great Mills while the commissioner preferred Nicholls State Park (as described in his remarks) — but emphasized that the community should set programming priorities.

Speakers asked the county to consider location options and funding and to work with community groups to develop a realistic, achievable facility that serves youth and broader neighborhood needs. No formal county commitment was recorded at the public forum; speakers said they would present a proposal to the commissioners in the future.