Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendment Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board votes to place zoning Amendment 10 on town warrant after earlier motion failed
Summary
The West Swanzey Planning Board voted to put zoning Amendment 10 on the town warrant after clarifying that an earlier motion to deny the amendment had failed and left it in limbo; the board sought advice from the New Hampshire Municipal Association and the town attorney before voting.
The West Swanzey Planning Board voted to place zoning Amendment 10 on the town warrant after members determined a prior motion to deny the amendment had failed and therefore left the article in procedural limbo.
Planning Board member Victoria made the motion to move Amendment 10 onto the warrant; Mark seconded. The board took a roll-call-style vote. The transcript records Michael York voting “no,” Richard voting “yes,” and Victoria voting “yes.” The meeting record indicates the motion passed and the amendment will be placed on the warrant for the town election.
Board members said they had sought informal guidance before the vote. The chair reported contacting the New Hampshire Municipal Association, which advised voting to move the article because it was otherwise in limbo. The town attorney (referred to in the meeting as Cordell) provided a separate opinion that the amendment was likely intended to be placed on the warrant based on the prior chair’s instruction; the attorney recommended voting to be safe. The board proceeded with a vote to remove uncertainty and to ensure the amendment could proceed to the warrant.
Board members emphasized that a failed motion to deny does not itself approve an amendment or cause it to advance; a separate motion to approve or to place the article on the warrant is required. The board discussed that public hearings were complete on the amendment and that additional debate about the article’s substance was not in order at this point; the vote before the board was specifically procedural — whether to place the amendment on the warrant.
Following the vote, some members raised concerns about procedural timing for other warrant articles (for example Amendment 8) and the adequacy of time for related parties and commissions to review late submissions; the board discussed the statutory deadline that governs submission timelines and noted the town will follow established rules on petition and article filing.
The board directed staff to proceed with administrative steps necessary to include Amendment 10 on the warrant.
