Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board weighs optional business licensing and low-cost finance tools as economic development priorities
Summary
County staff proposed a voluntary business license registry, and outside consultants outlined low‑cost financing and incentive options, including CDFI partnerships, micro‑loan programs and a community loan fund. Supervisors asked for more business outreach and asked staff to return with details.
County staff asked the Board of Supervisors to consider establishing an optional business license program for businesses in the unincorporated areas and to evaluate a range of small‑scale financing tools and incentives to support local businesses.
At the workshop, the county’s economic development manager summarized early research showing about 4,600 businesses countywide; staff estimated roughly 900 businesses are located in unincorporated areas. Staff proposed a voluntary licensing/registration program intended primarily as a communication and data tool to help the county reach small businesses with regulatory updates, grant opportunities and services. County staff said administration could be cost‑neutral and suggested an initial annual fee could be kept low or the registry could be free and voluntary; the board requested additional outreach to local chambers and business groups before any new program is adopted.
Kristin York of the Sierra Business Council presented possible incentive and financing options that the county could pursue with little to moderate up‑front cost. She recommended a set of low‑barrier first steps: partner with community development financial institutions (CDFIs) to expand lending reach, expand Small Business Administration microloan access, use the statewide SCIP infrastructure program to allow developers to finance up‑front infrastructure costs, and participate in the federal/state rural renewable energy financing programs.
York also recommended evaluating a community loan fund — a revolving loan pool that could be seeded by public and private contributions — and directed tax‑increment or other tax‑backed options for larger projects. Supervisors said they supported preliminary, modest steps in the first category but asked staff to consult widely with local businesses and chambers, and to return with implementation details, fee structures and cost‑estimates before creating mandatory programs.
Ending: Staff will return with an outreach plan to chambers and merchant groups and a staff analysis of cost and administration options for a voluntary licensing program and for priority financing tools. The board directed staff to bring back proposals through the budget subcommittee for consideration.
