Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Appropriations Claims Adjustments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council, auditor and counsel debate claim adjustments, appropriations and fund reporting ahead of February meeting
Summary
Scott County council members, the auditor and the council attorney spent much of the Jan. 23 special meeting discussing claim adjustments, fund appropriations and the need for clearer reporting; the attorney urged formal resolutions for transfers between funds and the auditor outlined statutory limits and exceptions for certain funds.
A sustained portion of the Jan. 23 special meeting focused on claim adjustments, how money has been moved between funds, and what the county council must approve.
Council members pressed the auditor for clarity about which funds had been used for recent payments and whether those funds had been properly appropriated. Auditor Jennifer said some expenditures had been paid from the general fund pending a determination of which account should properly bear the cost. She said certain funds must be appropriated by the council before they are spent and noted that one fund, the commissary, is treated differently under statute if specific conditions are met.
The council's attorney urged caution. The attorney said claim adjustments can resemble transfers that change appropriations and recommended preparing resolutions to document movement between funds: "I'd rather paper things up ... I can definitely draft the resolutions. I just need to know where it's coming from and where it's going to and the amount." The attorney warned that moving money between funds without council approval undermines fiscal transparency and makes it hard for council members to exercise budgetary oversight.
The auditor said staff is performing claim adjustments where allowable (for example, correcting payroll charged to the wrong line) and is working to produce reports that show appropriated amounts, expenditures against appropriations and unappropriated fund balances. Council members requested that information before the Feb. 25 regular meeting; the auditor set an internal deadline for departments to submit items for advertisement by Feb. 6 (noon on Feb. 6 for a Feb. 25 meeting).
Other specifics discussed included the statutory limits on how commissary funds can be used and that auction funds must be spent only for enumerated purposes in the governing ordinance. The group also discussed upcoming agenda items for the Feb. 25 meeting, including a veterans request, health department items and highway department transfers.
The council set no formal transfers at this meeting; the attorney and auditor agreed to prepare paperwork and reports so the council can consider formal resolutions at a subsequent meeting.
