Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents object to multiple appointments tied to Merritt Island incorporation campaign; consent slate approved
Summary
Dozens of public commenters urged the board to reject several consent‑agenda appointments, citing long-serving members, alleged incorporation advocacy and possible conflicts. The consent agenda (including the contested appointments) passed by roll call.
Several residents spoke during public comment at the Jan. 14 Brevard County commission meeting urging commissioners to reject or reconsider recent appointments to citizen advisory boards, principally citing Merritt Island incorporation advocacy and long service by incumbents.
Speakers including Sandra Sullivan, Diana Schomer, Diane Locklear, Stell Bailey and others objected to the reappointment of specific individuals (naming Marcus Herman among others) and to an appointment to the Tourism Development Council (naming Andrew Connors). Commenters said some advisory‑board members had served for decades and suggested enforcing or enforcing-term limits and more transparent recruitment. Multiple speakers said they opposed Merritt Island incorporation and said certain appointees had publicly advocated for incorporation; others raised concerns about perceived conflicts or lack of relevant business qualifications for tourism‑related seats.
At least one speaker alleged that prior incorporation-related actions were improperly taken under public comment and said Florida law requires such votes to be placed on an agenda; that assertion was presented as public comment and not adjudicated at the meeting.
Before the consent roll call, two commissioners announced they would vote “no” on particular consent items: one commissioner said they would vote “no” on F11 but yes on everything else, while two commissioners announced they would vote “no” on F10 and yes on other items. The consent agenda passed by roll call. The clerk later recorded a unanimous “yes” for the consent motion when the entire slate was called.
Commissioners did not take separate roll-call votes on each contested appointment during the meeting transcript; the appointments remained on the consent agenda and were approved as part of the consent motion. Speakers asked the board to increase outreach and advertising for vacancies and to report regularly on members’ activity on the boards.
Ending: Speakers pressed the commission to revisit appointment policies and to consider term-limit enforcement and broader recruitment; commissioners did not reverse the appointments at the meeting.
