Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conditional Use Wetlands topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board begins work on conditional‑use permits for wetland buffers, planning to draft ordinance language for next town meeting
Summary
The Planning Board discussed drafting conditional‑use permit language—primarily to regulate activities near wetlands and to provide an alternative to variances—agreeing the change would require ordinance language and placement on a future town warrant, and that the Conservation Commission must be involved in drafting and review.
The West Swanzey Planning Board opened a substantive discussion on creating a conditional‑use permit process, primarily aimed at managing development near wetlands and offering a review path distinct from variances.
Board members and staff said any conditional‑use permit system would require changes to the town zoning ordinance and therefore could not take effect until approved at a future town meeting. Planning staff reported they will research model language and guidance, including a wetlands draft in the Innovative Land Use handbook referenced during the meeting, and coordinate with the Conservation Commission and other departments.
Members discussed how conditional uses differ from special exceptions and variances: special exceptions are decided by the zoning board with a particular legal standard, variances have strict hardship tests, and conditional uses allow towns to set their own criteria and provide an additional review step. Participants said the Planning Board would likely handle review for site‑plan applications that trigger wetlands‑related conditional uses, with the Conservation Commission providing technical input before the Planning Board acts.
Board members raised procedural concerns about timing and department review cycles. Several members said submissions sometimes arrive too close to meeting dates for full Conservation Commission review; staff said they will forward application packages to board members earlier and continue to coordinate meeting schedules to allow commission input. The board emphasized the intent to use conditional uses cautiously and to consider starting with wetlands and a small list of other uses (for example, cluster developments or innovative land uses) that would benefit from case‑by‑case review.
No formal vote was taken; members instructed staff to continue drafting options, consult with other municipalities, and return with proposed language and a recommended list of uses for inclusion in the ordinance to be considered for a future town warrant.
