Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tree Protection 232 Oak Grove topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves small Oak Grove remodel with limited tree impacts
Summary
Commission approved a modest remodel and small additions at 232 Oak Grove that require a tree protection zone exception (3x and 4x for two redwoods); town arborist reported minimal root impact from exploratory trenching and staff recommended approval.
Get email alerts on the Tree Protection 232 Oak Grove topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning Commission approved a tree protection zone exception permit for a remodel and small additions at 232 Oak Grove Avenue after staff and the town arborist concluded the work would cause minimal impact to two large coast redwood trees.
Town Planner Britney Bennetts introduced the application as a modest interior remodel and small additions that would trigger a 3x exception for one coast redwood and a 4x exception for another. Bennetts said staff recommended approval and turned the item to the town arborist for technical comments.
Town Arborist Sally told the commission the redwoods are very large (about 80 inches in diameter), that exploratory trenching found no roots larger than two inches in the specific area of the proposed addition, and that less than 1% of roots would be impacted by the work. “For this, it's very minor impacts even though the TPCs are pretty low,” she said, and recommended approval on that basis.
Applicant Shao Chang (identified in the record as the project representative) confirmed the team had performed exploratory trenching and engaged an arborist per staff direction; the applicant described the proposal as a remodel to accommodate multigenerational occupancy and said they had followed staff and arborist direction during design.
The commission moved to approve the Tree Protection Zone Exception Permit (PTPZ2400010) for 232 Oak Grove Avenue, citing CEQA categorical exemptions. The roll call yielded no opposed votes recorded; one commissioner offered no response at roll call. Commission votes recorded: Commissioner Bridal — no recorded response; Commissioner Sandy Levinson — aye; Commissioner Paul Tonelli — aye; Vice Chair Bob Pulido — aye; Chair Cherilyn Lane — aye. The motion passed.
Why it matters: The action permits a modest in‑place remodel rather than triggering a full site redevelopment, which staff said would have greater risk to the mature redwoods. The town arborist’s field verification (exploratory trenching) was a decisive factor in the staff recommendation.
Next steps: Staff will file the permit and monitor compliance with the conditions described in the permit certificate.

