Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety Bullying topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and students press Judson board on bullying, cyberbullying and alternative placements; administrators outline processes
Summary
Multiple public speakers urged the Judson ISD board to strengthen anti-bullying responses, transparency and enforcement. Speakers described alleged incidents of physical and cyberbullying; district staff explained campus anti-bullying committees, DAEP and JJAEP distinctions and local response practices.
During the public comment period multiple community members described bullying and cyberbullying incidents and asked the board to change district processes and improve transparency. Speakers included parents and a student who said prior reporting did not prevent a later assault, and a parent who said cyberbullying investigations required escalation.
Public concerns described
- Physical assaults and perceived under-response: Several speakers described incidents they said resulted in serious injury or threat and said campus responses had been inadequate. One parent read local news coverage and said "bullying tends to be met with an underwhelming sense of urgency." Another parent said she and her son reported threats to administrators repeatedly and did not feel protected.
- Cyberbullying and agency escalation: Speakers praised members of Judson's technology team and the superintendent for helping escalate a cyberbullying investigation to the FBI when local investigation avenues were judged insufficient, and they urged consistent escalation for serious online threats.
- Anti-bullying committee access and David's Law: A parent asked whether campus anti-bullying committees comply with David's Law (the Texas anti-cyberbullying statute). Assistant superintendent Dr. Gosch told the board campuses have anti-bullying committees and that behavioral threat-assessment teams "serve in those capacities as well"; he described a process by which campus administrators and pupil services review cases to determine if the incident meets statutory bullying criteria.
- Disciplinary placement clarifications: Administrators clarified the difference between district alternative placements (DAEP/JCARE) and juvenile justice alternative education program (JJAEP). Dr. Gosch explained that mandatory expulsions carry JJAEP placement and may be paid by the state; discretionary placements are district decisions, sometimes billed to the district. He said the statevaping law increased DAEP/JCARE placements in some instances.
Board and staff responses
Administration invited specific cases to be handled offline and noted operational steps already taken: training on conflict resolution and reporting, campus-level character and social-emotional instruction, home visits and a district truancy effort in response to dropout and mobility concerns. Dr. Gosch confirmed anti-bullying committees and behavioral threat-assessment teams are part of district policy and are activated when appropriate.
Ending
Speakers called for clearer communication with parents and consistent investigative follow-through; administrators said processes exist and pledged additional attention and follow-up for specific cases raised during public comment.
