Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education Staffing Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Independent staffing review finds Judson ISD 'sufficiently staffed' numerically but urges changes in scheduling and training
Summary
Stetson & Associates presented an audit of Judson ISD special education staffing. The firm found the district has numerically sufficient special education staffing compared with peers but recommended a noncategorical staffing model, strengthened co-teaching practices, calibrated evaluations and expanded training to increase effectiveness.
Get email alerts on the Special Education Staffing Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stetson & Associates presented the results of an internal staffing study of Judson ISD's special education department during the board's regular meeting. Dr. Cynthia Short, the consultant who led the review, told trustees the study combined a comparable-district analysis, staff and principal focus groups, classroom learning walks and a staff survey.
Sufficiency and the numbers
Stetson reported the district is "sufficiently staffed" on a head-count basis compared with similar districts, and that Judson employs a higher share of special education teachers than statewide averages. Dr. Short noted the district's special education population runs higher than the state average — her report cited a higher percentage of students with disabilities overall and particular concentrations in learning disabilities and emotional-disability categories.
Efficiency, effectiveness and appropriateness
Dr. Short identified scheduling and instructional-practice issues that reduce the district's effective capacity: she recommended moving toward a noncategorical staffing model so district leaders allocate staff by student need instead of by fixed program labels, and she urged changes to master-scheduling methods so special education services are built into schedules before general sections are set.
Classroom observations found many co-teaching settings operating as "one teach, one assist," not as fully collaborative co-teaching; Dr. Short recommended targeted professional development and protected collaborative planning time so two-certified-teacher models deliver consistent co-teaching instruction. Stetson also recommended calibration for special education evaluative decisions and tighter MTSS/RTI protocols so interventions are documented and exhausted prior to special education referral when appropriate.
Board discussion and follow-up
Board members pressed about caseload distribution and turnover. Dr. Short and district leaders acknowledged point-in-time data can change quickly, especially in a district with high mobility, and said vacancies or midyear influxes can create temporary staffing pressures. Trustees asked administration to pursue the reportrecommendations on scheduling and expanded training and return with implementation steps.
Ending
District leaders said they would incorporate Stetsonrecommendations into ongoing work on MTSS, master scheduling and professional development. Dr. Short concluded that while head-count sufficiency exists, the district could increase effectiveness by reallocating staff and investing in collaborative teaching and evaluation calibration.

