Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Staff brief outlines structure, funding and legal limits of Washington state pension systems
Summary
Amanda Cecil, staff to the Senate Ways & Means Committee, gave a primer on Washington’s public retirement systems, explaining plan types, benefit formulas, funding metrics, governing bodies and recent federal changes affecting a small group of retirees.
Amanda Cecil, staff to the Senate Ways & Means Committee, opened the committee’s Jan. 23 work session with an overview of Washington State’s public retirement systems, describing plan types, benefit calculations, governance, funding measures and a recent federal change affecting a small group of retirees.
Cecil said Washington’s public pensions include multiple systems commonly referred to by acronyms (PERS, TRS, LEOFF and others) and that within each system members generally fall into one of three plans: Plan 1 (closed defined benefit), Plan 2 (defined benefit with a 50/50 employer/employee cost split) and Plan 3 (a hybrid with a defined‑benefit portion plus a defined‑contribution account). “Within Washington state, there’s also hybrid plans that includes a little bit of both,” she said.
Why it matters: the committee is considering several bills that would change benefit formulas,…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
