Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Audit Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Auditors give Tooele district a 'clean' opinion on FY2024 financial statements; single‑audit flags procurement documentation for one federal program

2145030 · January 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

External auditors reported an unmodified (clean) opinion on the district's FY2024 financial statements but identified procurement and approval documentation issues in federal testing of the substance abuse program, producing a qualified finding on that program.

External auditors presenting to the Tooele County School District Board on Jan. (date not specified) said they issued an unmodified opinion on the district’s fiscal‑year 2024 financial statements but reported compliance weaknesses in federal program testing tied to procurement documentation.

Why it matters: an unmodified (commonly called "clean") opinion indicates the auditors found the district’s financial statements to be presented fairly in all material respects under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). However, the single‑audit compliance testing found procurement and approval documentation issues that produced a qualified compliance finding for a federal program tied to substance‑abuse funding. That qualified finding affects federal compliance reporting and may require corrective actions.

What auditors told the board: An auditor said the fiscal statements warranted an unmodified opinion and described that as the highest grade auditors can give. The auditors additionally reported work on federal programs — they tested special education and Education Stabilization Fund expenditures under the Uniform Guidance — and found a qualified opinion in the single‑audit related to procurement documentation and approvals for the substance abuse program. Auditors told trustees they found no questioned costs overall and issued an unmodified opinion for state compliance testing under the state audit guide; the procurement issues were noted again in that context.

Board questions and staff responses: Trustees asked whether the audit indicated how the district was using funds and whether there were concerns about ongoing financial management. Auditors said their work is historical (fiscal year ended June 30, 2024) and pointed trustees to fund financial statements: total fund balances across all district funds of about $210 million as of June 30, 2024, and a general fund balance of about $36.5 million (including an education stabilization or "rainy day" balance of about $9.8 million and an unassigned general fund balance of about $20.5 million). Auditors said total revenues and expenditures for the fiscal year were roughly equal at about $191 million, with a slight increase in revenues over expenditures (~$411,000).

Next steps: Auditors recommended corrective action on procurement documentation where necessary; district staff said they would follow up and work with auditors to address the compliance items. The board did not record a formal acceptance motion on the audit during the presentation, and staff said in past years the auditors presented primarily for information; formal acceptance practices vary across meetings.

Ending: Auditors thanked district staff for preparation and cooperation; trustees thanked auditors and staff for the presentation.