Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance Facilities Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District finance chief reports RMA compliance; board discusses prioritization amid rising costs and bond planning
Summary
Chief Business Official Alejandra Garibay told trustees the district has met or exceeded the 3% restricted maintenance account requirement in recent years and projects a $2 million baseline for the current year; trustees discussed prioritization, safety and how the bond will affect long-term facility planning.
Get email alerts on the Finance Facilities Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Galt Joint Union Elementary School District’s Chief Business Official reported that the district has met or exceeded the state-required 3% contribution to its Restricted Maintenance Account (RMA) in recent fiscal years and projects the current year requirement around $2,000,000.
Alejandra Garibay reviewed recent years: for 2020–21 the calculated 3% requirement was roughly $1.3 million and the district made an extra contribution of about $39,000 to meet the requirement after expenditures; for 2021–22 the requirement rose to about $1.4 million and actual expenditures exceeded the 3% threshold (reported at roughly 3.10%); for 2022–23 the required 3% was about $1.6 million and actuals were about 3.06%; and for 2023–24 the required 3% was about $1.7 million and reported actuals were higher (approximately 3.3%). Garibay said some planned projects were delayed into the next fiscal year and that the district’s projection for the current year is $2,000,000 (a required 3% baseline of about 1.8% of expenditures) with a current percentage of 3.18.
Trustees asked whether the 3% baseline results in forgone work and how rising costs and a forthcoming bond should affect the district’s approach. Garibay said safety-related maintenance is prioritized and the 3% functions as a baseline for annual and cyclic upkeep (flooring, HVAC, painting, playground and fencing repairs), while larger projects remain candidates for bond funding. Another board member noted the district maintains a five‑year plan and that annual work is typically targeted site-by-site so the bond can be preserved for major capital projects.
No formal board action was required; trustees requested continued updates and a spring planning session to review facilities needs and coordinate the RMA with bond planning.

