Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Construction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Estill County board approves BG-1 filing to pursue state funding for new school; cost figures in transcript unclear

2144668 · January 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Estill County Board of Education on Jan. 23 approved a BG-1 to pursue state construction funding for a new Estill County school. District staff said local and legislative commitments exist but the total project cost as read in the meeting transcript appears garbled and was not clearly stated.

At a special meeting on Jan. 23, 2025, the Estill County Board of Education voted unanimously to approve a BG-1 filing to begin the state review process for a proposed new Estill County school.

District staff member Mr. Brock recommended approval, saying the BG-1 is the district's next step toward asking the legislature for construction money. "The process has changed a little bit," Brock said. In the meeting transcript Brock read a number for the project total as "$48,000,814,867," and also said the district already had "$5,000,000" from the legislature and had committed "1.5" locally; those figures as recorded in the transcript appear garbled and the district did not provide a clear, confirmed total cost in the meeting.

The BG-1 is the preliminary form required by the Kentucky Department of Education to request state capital funding for school construction. Brock told the board there will be geotechnical and site-preparation work and that the BG-1 may be revised later as site work and cost estimates are refined.

Tammy Hardy moved to approve the BG-1; Carrie Smallwood seconded. The board approved the motion on a roll-call vote: Tammy Hardy — yes; Carrie Smallwood — yes; Sheila Samples — yes; Donna Isford — yes. The motion carried 4-0.

Board members and staff did not provide an alternate, clarified total project budget during the meeting. Brock said additional site and preparatory work was expected and that the BG-1 can be revised to reflect updated costs. The board did not take any other formal action on contracts, bonds or a construction timeline at the session.

The board meeting record and the BG-1 form will be available through the superintendent's office after filing, and any further budget details are expected to appear in later board documents as the project advances.