Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Programming And Scheduling topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Shelby County board discusses block scheduling and middle‑school career pathways; no formal action taken

2144572 · January 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members and staff discussed proposed master schedules that would expand block scheduling, increase AP and dual‑credit access, create intervention time and give middle‑school students exposure to multiple career pathways; the board did not adopt a final schedule at the meeting.

The Shelby County Board of Education discussed proposed changes to master scheduling, including moving to block scheduling at secondary levels and expanding middle‑school career center opportunities, but took no formal vote.

Superintendent Dr. Matthews told the board staff and administrators are developing master schedules with an emphasis on preserving AP and dual‑credit opportunities while creating intervention time for students below grade level. “We’re wanting to make for sure that we have an ability for our students to have AP courses and be in band and do some of those other things,” Dr. Matthews said, adding that staff will produce schedules for board review and that he has not yet seen a final version.

Board members described potential benefits and concerns. Supporters said block scheduling could create longer periods for project‑based and cooperative learning and give teachers time to work directly with students. Staff also said middle schools would seek to expose students to a broader set of career pathways — one presenter said the goal was to let students experience about 12 different pathways before high school. No final decision or vote was recorded; Dr. Matthews said the item remains in the planning stage and the administration will present a completed proposal for board consideration.

Ending: Board members requested that administrators finalize draft schedules and bring recommended master schedules back for formal review before any adoption or changes affecting student schedules.