Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves routine measures and architect contract; votes at a glance from Jan. 21 Greece Central meeting
Summary
The board approved a series of routine agenda items unanimous or by large margins, including moving the agenda as amended, personnel and contract reports, emergency warehouse floor repair funding and a resolution awarding architect design services; a separate article‑78 matter was tabled for follow‑up.
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
GREECE, N.Y. — The Greece Central School District Board of Education took a string of procedural votes and contract actions on Jan. 21. Most motions passed unanimously; the board also discussed and ultimately tabled further action on regionalization litigation (Article 78).
Votes at a glance (key items and outcomes):
- Agenda approval as amended: moved by Mr. Stetzel, seconded by Mr. Butler; passes 9–0. (Board added agenda item 6.06, resolution for architect design services.)
- Staffing items (moved to the table): moved by Mr. Bonagorio, seconded by Mr. Butler; passes 9–0.
- Tenure area changes: moved by Ms. Slaik, seconded by Ms. Mallor; passes 9–0.
- Quarterly reporting of professional services contracts greater than $50,000 (item 6.01): motion to table moved by Mr. Stetzel; passes 9–0 (written informational material provided).
- Tax tertiary settlement refund (item 6.02): moved by Ms. Moore, seconded by Mr. Butler; passes 9–0.
- Extra Classroom Activity Funds quarterly report: moved by Mr. Bonagorio, seconded by Vice President Farmer; passes 9–0.
- Authorization for emergency replacement of the warehouse floor (transportation support services center): moved by Mr. Stetzel, seconded by Mr. Butler; passes 9–0. The board and administration noted a lawsuit has been filed; the repair work will proceed and the district expects to seek reimbursement if litigation is successful. A specific appropriation will be presented to the board later to fund the repair (estimate referenced at up to $912,000).
- Updated yearly appointments: moved by Mr. Stetzel, seconded by Vice President Farmer; passes 9–0.
- Resolution for architect design services (item 6.06): moved by Ms. Moore, seconded by Vice President Farmer; passes 9–0. The administration reported two proposals were received after a revised solicitation; the committee recommended awarding to SWBR based on capacity and experience with multi‑phase projects. Board members who participated in the vetting process praised the committee review.
- Consent agenda (various donations and extra classroom funds acknowledged): moved by Mr. Stetzel, seconded by Mr. Maloney; passes 9–0.
- Student trip approval: moved by Mr. Stetzel, seconded by Vice President Farmer; passes 9–0. Presenter noted the trip cost is funded through Title IV.
- Article 78 / regionalization matter: the board voted to lift the matter from the table for discussion (vote to lift 7–2), then later voted to lift it again for discussion (vote 8–1) and ultimately took a non‑debatable motion to table further action until the board can receive follow‑up from counsel; motion to table passes 9–0. Counsel told the board that a court scheduling order is likely to extend normal timelines, giving the board time to vet options before deciding whether and how to participate.
- Adjournment: motion to adjourn passed 8–1.
Why it matters: most approved items were routine fiscal and administrative actions that keep district operations moving and allow time‑sensitive repairs and procurements to proceed. The architect award advances a multi‑phase capital planning effort; the warehouse floor authorization allows emergency repairs to start while the district pursues reimbursement through litigation.
What the board asked for: members requested future detail on the warehouse floor appropriation and reimbursement plan, additional context on pupil‑activity account balances, and more information on participation options before acting on the Article 78 litigation.

