Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boards And Commissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reappoints airport commissioners; debate surfaces over appointment process and representation
Summary
Council reappointed four current airport commission members but members debated how appointments are advertised and whether the commission’s selection method and size should be revisited to ensure broader public opportunity and representation.
Chester County Council approved reappointments to the Airport Commission but the item generated extended discussion about how non‑council appointments are advertised and whether the commission’s appointment structure and membership should better reflect county diversity.
With four applicants for four open seats, the council approved reappointment of George Whitesides, John Davis, Henry Lester Sugar Jr. and Rusty Darby to the five‑member commission. Staff said one applicant was disqualified for a conflict of interest. Several council members said the appointment had not been publicly advertised because the incumbents had expressed interest in reappointment; other members said that practice limits public awareness and opportunity for broader representation.
Council members discussed ways to improve outreach and transparency for boards and commissions: staff and the clerk of council said term expirations are posted on the county website and that the clerk typically handles boards and commissions advertising and administration. Council asked staff and the clerk to develop a clear, consistent process for advertising vacancies, notifying council members and vetting applicants; the county attorney was asked to examine whether the Airport Commission’s membership or appointment method (established in state statute and local agreement) could be changed to give each council member an appointee.
Several council members also raised diversity and equity concerns: one council member said no Black resident had served on the airport commission and urged the development of an appointment process that widens outreach. Staff said they would work with the clerk and county attorney to propose a vetted process for future appointment cycles.
Why this matters: boards and commissions influence county services and policy implementation; how members are selected and whether vacancy notices are broadly advertised affects representation and community trust.
What’s next: staff and the clerk of council will draft a proposed process for advertising vacancies and notifying council members; the county attorney will research statutory constraints on changing commission size or appointment rules and report back to council.
