Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivisions And Parcels topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board reviews final plat for 1917 Upland Ave.; no board ‘call up’ requested
Summary
The board discussed the final plat to subdivide 1917 Upland Avenue into five lots and asked staff and the applicant clarifying questions about stormwater language, sidewalks along Vine Street and future zoning rules for building permits; no one moved to call up the item for further board action.
City planning staff and the applicant briefed the Planning Board Jan. 7 on a final plat application to subdivide 1917 Upland Avenue into five lots (Nauman subdivision, case TEC20180044). The final plat lists lot sizes as: Lot 1 — 24,699 sq ft; Lot 2 — 7,376 sq ft; Lot 3 — 8,725 sq ft; Lot 4 — 7,922 sq ft; Lot 5 — 8,260 sq ft.
The board's discussion focused on three topics: stormwater language in the subdivision agreement, sidewalk improvements on the south side of Vine Street, and how future zoning or new standards (the board discussed the proposed Family‑Friendly/Vibrant Housing changes and transit‑related allowances) could affect future building permit reviews.
Commissioner Kurt asked about an apparent inconsistency between the agreement's ‘‘historic conveyance’’ language and stormwater detention shown on the plat. City planner Adam Allegra replied that FEMA changed the flood‑plain mapping since the preliminary plat; staff had updated drainage easements on the final plat to reflect current floodplain conditions. "The flood command zone has changed since this first came in," Allegra said, and staff and engineers updated drainage easements accordingly. Planning staff characterized the language in the agreement as stock language used across subdivision agreements; Charles Farrell of Planning and Development Services told the board the final engineering drawings will govern built drainage.
Board members asked whether sidewalks on the south side of Vine Street remain required; staff replied the south side had not been required as part of the original annexation and that the timing to require construction had passed. Commissioner Mark asked whether lots created by the final plat would be subject to future upzoning or new standards when building permits are pulled; staff said building permits will be regulated under the code in effect at the time a permit is submitted. The board asked staff to confirm whether the lots lie inside any transit‑oriented quarter that might make them eligible for future standards; staff said they would check the map and follow up.
No member of the board moved to call up the item for additional review; staff advised that the application is subject to a call‑up deadline on or before Jan. 9, 2025. The board's clarifying questions were noted and staff said they would follow up on the sidewalk status and any mapping questions as part of the record.
