Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board delays decision on armed security contracts for libraries, asks for social-worker plan

2142649 · January 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors continued a vote on contracts for armed security at 25 county libraries, seeking a report back on social-worker alternatives and contract details before taking final action.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on Jan. 21 continued action on a proposed contracts package for armed security at county libraries, citing questions about alternatives and the balance between law enforcement and social-service responses.

Supervisor Hahn introduced a board letter seeking approval of multiple contracts to provide armed, on-call security at high-risk library locations. The contracts would be awarded to InterCon Security Services with a five-year potential aggregate value (board letter lists up to about $65.7 million over five years if fully deployed). For the near term the department estimated about $4 million in contract value to cover 25 high-risk libraries and said the county would save roughly $700,000 compared with prior sheriff-contracted services.

Why supervisors delayed the vote

Several supervisors pressed library officials on why the county is contracting armed guards rather than restoring social-worker or clinician teams that had previously supported library de-escalation and referral efforts. Library Director Skye Patrick said the department prefers social workers but lacks the in-house classification/management infrastructure and budget to run those contracts immediately; staff said the department has requested the positions and now has authority to manage social workers but also needs funding.

Supervisor Mitchell asked whether InterCon guards have de-escalation and implicit-bias training; library staff said the vendor has experience in library environments and provided examples of other library systems they serve. Several supervisors requested the underlying incident-report data used to designate locations as "high risk."

Board action

Supervisor Hahn moved and Supervisor Mitchell seconded a request to continue the item 2 weeks to allow the department to provide a report back (including cost comparisons and a plan to restore social-worker staffing and oversight). The board approved the two-week continuance unanimously. The library added that it intends to preserve staffing continuity by transitioning existing contracted staff into the new contract if the board approves at a later date.

What to watch

The department’s report back is due on a short timetable. Supervisors asked for details on incident-reporting trends, training for vendor staff, the specific cost trade-offs between armed guards and contracted social workers/clinicians, and proposed oversight to protect staff and library patrons.

Ending note

Supervisors emphasized they want to restore more social-service responses where feasible but need the department to show how those services can be implemented rapidly and sustainably before the board votes on a long-term contract.