Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Design Guidelines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses restoring 'highly visible' language, porch rules and landscaping guidance for updated guidelines
Summary
Commissioners reviewed proposed edits to the design guidelines, including reintroducing 'highly visible' language, clarifying primary/secondary/rear facade rules (especially for corner lots), and adding landscaping screening rules for pools/decks on visible corner lots; staff asked for member feedback by the first full week of February.
Get email alerts on the Planning And Design Guidelines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission staff brought a substantive discussion on proposed edits to Newport’s design review guidelines to the Jan. 22 meeting, seeking commissioner input on visibility rules, facade definitions and landscaping controls.
Staff explained the update uses a primary/secondary/rear facade system but that some earlier language referencing “highly visible” elements was removed in a way that reduced staff and commission flexibility. Staff proposed reintroducing that language in limited locations so the commission — not staff alone — would exercise discretion on highly visible changes. The commission discussed whether certain character‑defining features (windows, doors, ornamentation) should retain stricter language when visible from streets or sidewalks, particularly on corner properties where rear facades can be exposed.
On landscaping, staff said the current guidelines lack clear rules on pools, decks and gazebos; staff proposed requiring screening for highly visible site amenities (fences or greenery would satisfy the screening). Commissioners asked staff to research model language and examples; staff said she would provide example guidance drawn from several municipalities and a National Park Service preservation brief. Staff asked commissioners to send feedback on proposed edits by the first full week of February and said a committee meeting would be scheduled if there is interest.
Commissioners did not take a vote on guideline language at the meeting but asked staff to circulate draft copies and illustrative photos for further review.

