Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee directs counsel to negotiate development deal for 200 North County after debate over $1.7 million in incentives
Summary
Waukegan aldermen voted in committee to direct Corporation Counsel to negotiate a development and incentive agreement with the Waukegan Community Development Partnership for redevelopment of 200 North County and related downtown parcels.
Get email alerts on the Downtown Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Waukegan aldermen voted in committee to direct Corporation Counsel to negotiate a development and incentive agreement with the Waukegan Community Development Partnership for redevelopment of 200 North County and related downtown properties.
The deal under consideration would offer a package of city incentives the presenters described as totaling $1,725,000. Staff outlined a proposed split of $900,000 in up‑front funding (to be paid at closing and later reimbursed from TIF 8), plus $825,000 payable over the life of the TIF, a waiver of building‑permit and inspection fees (estimated about $42,000 based on construction costs) and 19 free parking spaces in the 216 North County garage for up to 30 years. Staff also said the proposal would require extending Tax Increment Financing District 8 from the current 14‑year term to 26 years so more increment could be used to repay incentives.
Why it matters: Waukegan staff and outside consultants told aldermen the city’s financial projections make the package risky unless the TIF is extended. Under current 14‑year projections, staff said the two properties’ combined projected increment would produce roughly $556,000 available for incentives; that number rises to about $1,528,000 if the TIF is extended to 26 years. The city also has existing near‑term obligations against TIF 8 — including roughly $1.5 million of work on the downtown parking structure and other commitments staff listed — meaning the TIF fund balance (about $2.9 million as of Dec. 31) would be stretched by an additional $900,000 upfront payment.
Debate and conditions: Several aldermen, including Alderman Florian, urged caution. Florian noted the TIF fund’s other claims and said the city would be “giving $900,000 that we don’t have now to get $500,000 back in 14 years” under current projections and called that a poor investment without firmer guarantees. Staff responded that financing options include borrowing internally and reimbursing from future increment or drawing on contiguous TIFs (7 and 9) but that extending a TIF requires action by the Illinois legislature and consent of other taxing bodies (school and park districts). Staff also said more information is needed on the developer’s corporate structure and site control. Alderman Felix, sponsor of the instruction to counsel, said the proposal was intended as a downtown catalyst and that the developer had reduced its original request.
Next steps and vote: The committee moved to direct Corporation Counsel to negotiate a term sheet and development/incentive agreement and asked staff to return with periodic updates. The motion passed in committee and will move to the full City Council with continued negotiation expected between city staff, Alderman Felix and the developer.
Context: The developer’s concept presented earlier calls for 19 residential units and 6,700 square feet of commercial space at the former YMCA building (200 North County) and six residential units plus about 3,000 square feet of commercial space at 38 North Genesee. Staff said the developer estimates total project costs for the two properties at roughly $3.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and asked that increment from both parcels be used to help repay incentives. Staff said prior analysis was done with financial consultant SP Friedman and that consultant projections were more conservative than the developer’s.
What to watch: Whether the city secures a TIF extension from the Illinois legislature (which staff said requires consent of other taxing districts), whether the city identifies the $900,000 source, and any changes to the incentive structure (staff and several aldermen discussed phasing payments rather than a full up‑front disbursement).

