Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance.self Insurance Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Independent audit finds process‑and‑documentation recommendations; no systemic self‑insurance failures reported
Summary
An independent audit of the Davis County School District’s self‑insurance program found documentation gaps and recommended procedures but did not identify systemic mismanagement. The audit committee recommended continuing current benchmarking and claims‑trend monitoring rather than commissioning a costly, full‑detail claim‑by‑claim review.
Tim Leffel, Davis County School District business administrator, briefed the board on Jan. 21 about the independent audit of the district’s self‑insurance program and the audit committee’s recommendations.
Leffel said the engagement began in summer and that auditor BDO experienced staffing turnover and difficulties obtaining proprietary discount data from insurers, which delayed reporting. He told the board that the audit’s findings fell mainly into two categories: documentation and the depth of claim‑level auditing.
On documentation, the auditors recommended codifying benchmarks such as a reserve target. Leffel said the established practice has been to target three months of claims in reserve; the district currently holds a little over four and a half months and the audit committee preferred to keep the target as a procedural benchmark rather than convert it into a formal policy with rigid triggers.
On claim‑level review, Leffel explained that the auditors sampled individual claims (25 each for SelectHealth, Aetna and the district’s self‑insurance) for a total of 75 items and reported one small overpayment of $8.11. He said the committee weighed whether to hire a firm to audit every claim in detail, but such firms charge substantially and often find little when plans use major carriers with established procedures. The audit committee recommended continuing monthly reviews of claims trends and benchmarking against peer districts and reserved deeper claim‑by‑claim audits for future consideration if trends warrant them.
Audit committee members present thanked staff and described the audit as ultimately reassuring despite the lengthy process. The board’s audit chair invited members to propose future audit topics to the committee.
