Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves consent agenda and personnel; farm lease and auditorium use pass with split votes
Summary
At the Jan. 27 meeting the Springfield SD 186 board approved consent items and personnel recommendations, accepted a resignation, and approved a one‑year farm lease; the Landfair auditorium was approved for an upcoming candidate forum.
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Springfield School District 186 Board of Education approved several routine items and personnel actions at its Jan. 27 meeting and recorded roll‑call votes on a farm lease and a building‑use request.
Votes at a glance: - Consent agenda items 11.2 through 11.7 (details in board packet) — adopted 6–0. The packet included routine contracts and the district calendar for 2025–26. The board chair called the roll and the meeting record shows six aye votes.
- Personnel recommendations (roll call) — adopted 6–0. The personnel actions included acceptances, hires and separations and the superintendent noted the resignation of Dr. Thurman, who has accepted a position as state director of Fellowship of Christian Athletes in Illinois; Dr. Thurman will remain with the district for a transitional period.
- Farm lease for unimproved property on Cookie Mill Road — approved 5–1. The resolution authorizes a one‑year lease (March 1, 2025–Feb. 28, 2026) with Kane Family Farms at $300 per acre for approximately 40 acres (total $12,000). One board member voted no and said the district should consider an exit strategy for the property rather than continuing to lease it.
- Use of Landfair Auditorium for a board member candidate forum (Jan. 28, 2025) — approved 5–1. The event is being organized by the Springfield Education Association and candidates were invited to attend; one board member recorded a no vote.
The meeting record shows the board conducted the roll calls and recorded the vote tallies as described. No financial action on the facilities bond plan was taken at the meeting; that discussion was informational and next steps were scheduled for February and March.

