Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Boundaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CCSD advisory commission forwards multiple school rezoning recommendations to trustees
Summary
The Clark County School District Attendance Zone Advisory Commission voted unanimously Jan. 21 to forward four rezoning proposals affecting elementary, middle and high school attendance boundaries to the Board of School Trustees for final action Feb. 27.
Get email alerts on the School Boundaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Clark County School District Attendance Zone Advisory Commission voted Jan. 21 to forward four attendance-boundary recommendations to the Board of School Trustees, sending proposed rezoning plans for several elementary, middle and high schools to trustees for final consideration on Feb. 27.
Tracy Murphy, Demographics and Zoning staff for the Clark County School District, told the commission that the proposals were presented after public input meetings held Jan. 13–15 and were developed because some schools are in high-growth areas expected to add students. "In developing alternatives and in making its recommendations, the commission should follow all relevant district policies, regulations, procedures, and guidelines," Murphy said.
Why it matters: The recommendations would change where students attend school in parts of Henderson and other growth areas, shifting enrollment to use available capacity and to preserve feeder-school alignment. The proposals will not take effect unless the Board of School Trustees adopts them; trustees are scheduled to meet Feb. 27 at 5 p.m. to receive ASAC recommendations.
What the commission recommended
- Elementary schools (focus area E1): The commission voted to forward Proposal 2, a map that would reassign students among Wayne Tanaka, Judith Steele, Shelley Berkeley and Don D. Snyder elementary schools, as presented by staff. The motion was made by Commissioner Matthew Tramp and seconded by Commissioner Tim Vicario and passed with all votes in favor. During the meeting, a parent urged the commission to avoid uprooting students and suggested temporary measures such as a registration freeze until a proposed annex is completed; staff responded that Proposal 2 does not include grandfathering for currently enrolled students.
- Middle/junior high schools tied to Del H. Robison (focus area related to Robison dissolution): The commission voted to forward Proposal 1, which redistributes students from Del H. Robison Middle School to surrounding schools including Roy W. Martin, Mario C., Joanne Monaco, JD Smith and Duane D. Keller, preserving feeder alignments where possible. Commissioner Diane Kinzel moved the proposal and Commissioner Tim Vicario seconded; the motion passed unanimously.
- Middle schools (focus area M2: Del Webb/Silvestri): The commission voted to forward Proposal 1, with a recommendation that grandfathering be applied for students currently enrolled in grades 6 and 7 in the reassigned area (so only incoming grade-6 and newly enrolled students would be reassigned each year). Commissioner Lance Arndt moved the motion and Commissioner Noe Orozco seconded; the motion passed without opposition.
- High schools (focus area H1: Liberty/Silverado): The commission voted to forward Proposal 1 to shift portions of Liberty High School to Silverado High School to improve feeder alignment. The motion included grandfathering for students currently enrolled in grades 9–11 in reassigned areas (only incoming grade 9 students and newly enrolled students would be reassigned each year). Commissioner Noe Orozco moved the motion and Commissioner Rudy Zamora seconded; the motion passed unanimously.
Public input and discussion
Kimberly Nimhard, a parent with children at Judith Steele Elementary, spoke during the public-comment portion for the elementary proposal. "When I first heard about the rezoning of Steele, no other word could describe my reaction than devastation and sadness," Nimhard said, describing her family's connections to teachers and services at Steele and warning that moving students could cause psychological disruption. She proposed a registration freeze and noted several upcoming 5th-grade graduations she said would reduce overcrowding.
Commissioners and staff emphasized that the ASAC process is advisory and that the Board of School Trustees will make the final decisions. Tracy Murphy reminded commissioners that proposals were shaped by public input meetings, SOT (School Organizational Team) conversations at impacted schools, and written comments and emails received during the outreach period.
Next steps and context
The ASAC forwarded its recommendations to the Board of School Trustees, which will consider the items at its Feb. 27 meeting. One proposal (the Plan related to Del H. Robison) reflects an earlier board action: the board approved Revision 5 of the district capital improvement program, which included converting Del H. Robison Middle School to a choice high school and required dissolving the Robison attendance boundary to reassign affected students.
The commission closed its Jan. 21 meeting by thanking district staff for the outreach and data work that informed the proposals. No final boundary changes take effect until trustees act and any implementation details, including timelines and whether additional grandfathering or transitional measures will be applied, will be determined by the Board of School Trustees.

