Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Exemptions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ithaca committee backs raising income caps for senior and disabled property tax exemptions
Summary
The Committee of the Whole voted to move a local law and ordinance to raise income eligibility for city property tax exemptions for low-income seniors and people with disabilities, endorsing the higher $50,000 cap recommended in county analysis; the committee approved the items 10–0.
The Ithaca Common Council Committee of the Whole voted to move two items — a local law expanding the disability exemption and an ordinance expanding the senior citizens exemption — to allow the city to raise the income cutoff for partial property tax exemptions. The committee voted 10–0 to move the measures forward; both items require later steps before they take effect.
A county analysis presented to the committee showed how different income-cutoff thresholds would affect eligibility and the tax base: at the city’s current cutoff of $29,000 there were about 178 eligible households; increasing the cap to $36,500 raised eligibility to about 207 households; a $50,000 cutoff would expand eligibility to roughly 335 households. County staff provided median-tax-bill examples: at a median assessed value of $350,000, adopting the 36,500 level would add roughly $9.03 to a typical non-exempt property tax bill; the $50,000 option would raise that figure further (figures in the committee discussion ranged across assessment levels).
Jay Franklin of the county described the mechanics: the city’s decision affects only the city portion of property taxes; other taxing jurisdictions (county and school district) set their own income scales. Franklin said the city’s current exemption yields about $1,400 in average annual savings for an eligible senior under the present income scale, and that raising the city cutoff increases those average savings. Committee members debated the distributional trade-offs — that a modest increase in the tax burden for other property owners would concentrate relief for low-income seniors and people with disabilities — and several members said they supported using the maximum flexibility offered by New York state.
The committee directed that the local law (which requires a public hearing) and the ordinance be advanced in time to meet the March 1 filing deadline so any change could apply to the next assessment cycle if enacted.
