Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents criticize board's chaplaincy vote and press for clarity on moving special‑education students into general classrooms
Summary
Public commenters at the Jan. 21 School Board of Osceola County meeting criticized the board's prior vote against a school chaplaincy program and urged transparency and planning from the district about proposed moves of some special‑education (ESE) students into general‑education classrooms.
Public comment at the Jan. 21 School Board of Osceola County meeting included two substantive appeals: one criticizing the board's prior vote against a school chaplaincy program, the other seeking clarity about planned changes to placements for students with special needs.
"I am here tonight to express my deep disappointment about how all 5 of you voted against the school chaplaincy program at the last meeting," said a resident who identified herself in the transcript as Nelly Hernandez. Hernandez said she had expected newly elected board members who spoke publicly about faith to support the program and urged the board to "rethink your position, pray, and ask God to guide you, if you believe in God." She also asked board members to acknowledge constituent emails.
Janet Moody, identified as a representative of the Osceola County Education Association, said her organization is preparing for bargaining and will bring survey results to district leaders. She thanked the board for its priorities and said the association will advocate for salary priorities and smaller class sizes.
Zaida Pena Andino, a resident of St. Cloud, raised questions about next-year plans to move students from self-contained ESE settings into general-education classrooms. She asked whether the district will share a plan with parents, how general-education teachers will be supported, whether teachers will require ESE certification, and what will happen to vocational-education staff and paraprofessionals. Pena Andino said parents need transparency about whether changes are inclusion-focused or budget-driven.
Board members listened to the comments; there was no board action recorded during public comment on either the chaplaincy matter or the ESE placement questions. The superintendent and staff later addressed related agenda items separate from public comment, and board members asked staff to work with the ESE department and parents on transitions and communications when implementation plans are prepared.
