Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board counsel warns limits on returning student representative to dais; board favors alternatives
Summary
Board discussion on reinstating a student representative on the dais flagged legal and procedural constraints. Counsel recommended written releases, selection criteria and limits on participation; board members asked staff to explore alternatives such as student participation in workshops or the superintendent's student advisory council.
Board members discussed whether to revive the practice of seating a student representative on the dais during regular board meetings and received a legal briefing about limits under current standards.
Miss Castillo introduced the item as a revival of a past practice intended to give students first-hand experience of board governance. The board's legal adviser advised caution, saying the district must ensure any student placed on the dais is protected and that the public be informed that some meeting content may not align with K–12 instructional standards. The attorney also suggested obtaining a signed release from the student and family, establishing a clear selection rubric to ensure equitable choices across schools, and setting written parameters for when and how a student may participate.
The attorney said a student on the dais should not be treated as a voting board member and recommended limiting participation so the student "understands that they are not necessarily a voting member of the school board for certain items. They are here to observe. They are here to provide comment when requested." The attorney further suggested that workshops — which do not include public comment — could be used as a more controlled environment for student participation.
Superintendent Dr. Shanoff told the board the district already has a Superintendent Student Advisory Council that is "ramping up" and could provide a cross-section of students to advise the district without exposing an individual student to the full public-comment environment of a regular board meeting.
After discussion, several board members said they were concerned that recent changes in law and policy make the previous dais arrangement less useful and more legally complex. The board reached consensus to have staff draft proposals for alternative engagement mechanisms (workshops, advisory council presentations and clearer criteria) rather than immediately reinstituting a student seated on the dais.
The board's next steps include asking district staff and general counsel to develop selection criteria, release language and participation parameters if the board wishes to pursue a dais-based student role in the future.
