Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
South Russell meeting approves height variance for proposed pool house
Summary
Members at a South Russell Village meeting approved a variance allowing a proposed pool house to exceed the 15-foot accessory building height limit; discussion focused on roof pitch, a cupola and window placement.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members at a South Russell Village meeting approved a height variance for a proposed pool house, allowing the accessory structure to exceed the village's 15-foot limit.
The application, listed as case number 115 and presented by Robert H. Meyer, received a motion that was seconded and passed with two recorded 'ayes.
The decision followed a short discussion about the pool house's design details. Speakers examined window placement on the rear elevation, differences in roof pitch compared with the main house, and the proportion of a proposed cupola. "The height of an accessory building is 15 feet," said Unnamed official 2, a voting member, noting the code limit the variance would exceed. Unnamed official 1, a voting member, signaled approval during the vote: "I have a second. I'm in favor. Aye. Aye."
Discussion included plans showing a hip roof on the ends and a cupola that several members described as slightly out of proportion but acceptable given the desire to keep overall roof height low. Panel members and the presenter noted one bathroom window that did not show clearly on some elevation drawings and confirmed the rear of the property backs onto open acreage; one participant estimated the rear setback at "close to 200" (units not specified).
The panel's approval permits the pool house to exceed the 15-foot accessory building height limit; the motion and final tally were recorded in the meeting minutes. No further conditions or follow-up reporting requirements were specified during the discussion. The meeting later moved on to scheduling matters and was adjourned.
The article is based on the meeting transcript excerpts where the application and subsequent discussion were introduced and concluded.

