Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Department of Mental Health outlines crisis continuum, requests $2.1 million budget adjustment
Summary
At an Appropriations Committee meeting, the Department of Mental Health described its continuum of care — from community supports to hospital beds — and presented a $2.1 million budget adjustment while warning staffing and placement constraints limit bed availability.
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Department of Mental Health told the Appropriations Committee that Vermont’s system of care extends from community supports and crisis response up to secure residential and hospital-level units, and that its fiscal-year adjustment request totals about $2.1 million.
Commissioner Emily Haas opened the presentation with an overview of the department’s “pyramid” of services, describing community outpatient supports, crisis response (including crisis beds and six recently opened mental-health urgent cares), intensive residential treatment, secure residential care at River Valley Therapeutic Community, and hospital-level inpatient units. “A bed isn’t necessarily a bed,” Haas said, describing situations where staffing, unit suitability or transportation can prevent a clinically appropriate placement even when a physical bed is available.
Financial director Shannon Thompson walked committee members through the department’s ups-and-downs packet. Thompson described funding columns shown in the packet — general fund, special funds (including hospital billings), interdepartmental transfers, federal funds and two Medicaid/global commitment columns — and said some line items in the packet are rebudgets or net-neutral transfers. Thompson said the department is seeking additional federal spending authority for programs with unspent federal funds and identified a budget pressure for private nonmedical institutions (PNMI), driven by utilization, the mix of in- and out-of-state placements and an annual rate-setting change.
Why it matters: committee members pressed the department on capacity and workforce limits that affect access to inpatient care and community placements. The department said staffing shortages and a lack of available housing or apartments for people with vouchers constrain flow through the continuum and can increase demand on higher-intensity services.
Key points from the presentation
- System overview: Haas described a multi-tiered continuum that begins with community services (therapy, assessments, service planning, shelter-plus-care vouchers and residential/group-home supports), moves to crisis supports and urgent cares, then to intensive residential and secure residential care, and finally to hospital-level inpatient beds.
- Urgent cares and mobile response: the department said it recently opened six mental-health urgent cares and expanded use of 988 and an enhanced 24/7 two-person mobile crisis response.
- Bed counts and capacity: the department reported roughly 229 hospital beds currently online statewide, with about 30 targeted to youth and adolescents. Haas and staff said there are beds designated as higher-intensity “level 1” units (replacement beds for the old state hospital model) as well as general adult units; the presentation cited 57 level-1 beds and 142 general units as the current configuration. The department cautioned that staffing gaps and unit-specific suitability can mean a physically available bed does not equate to an immediately usable placement.
- Local vs. centralized care: when asked whether the state should return to a centralized hospital (for example, reopening a Waterbury facility), Haas said creating a general-fund centralized hospital would be financially challenging and emphasized Vermont’s deliberate shift toward decentralized services to keep care closer to home.
- PNMI budget pressure: Thompson said PNMI spending is under pressure (the packet lists a significant PNMI increase attributable to utilization and an inflationary adjustment in the PNMI rate-setting rules administered by the Department of Vermont Health Access). Thompson described PNMI placements as residential services for “our most vulnerable kids” and noted that out-of-state placements sometimes are necessary.
Direct quotes and attributions
- “A bed isn’t necessarily a bed.” — Commissioner Emily Haas, Department of Mental Health
- “PNMI is really a residential. So our most vulnerable kids, usually our most acute kids, need some sort of residential placement.” — Samantha Sweet, deputy commissioner (as described in the meeting record)
- “The hospital in Waterbury would be a general fund hospital.” — Commissioner Emily Haas
What the department asked for and what comes next
Thompson described the packet’s bottom-line adjustment (presented during the hearing as an increase of about $2.1 million) and noted the ups-and-downs document will evolve as the budget process continues. Committee members and department staff agreed the Appropriations Committee will see a fuller, detailed budget presentation at a later date.
Reporting note: the department’s packet and slides were referenced repeatedly during the session; committee members and staff referred to printed materials and the department’s ups-and-downs spreadsheet during questions.

