Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Sheriff’s budget requests draw debate over taser funding, modular detention space and school‑bus camera position
Summary
Commissioners reviewed and debated multiple sheriff’s office budget requests, focusing on whether taser replacement should be paid from asset forfeiture or the general fund, how to fund a civilian automated‑enforcement specialist for school‑bus cameras, and how to account for a proposed modular building for corrections.
St. Mary’s County commissioners spent a lengthy portion of the May 13 budget work session reviewing the sheriff’s non‑grant budget requests and debating how to fund equipment and personnel priorities such as taser replacement, a proposed automated‑enforcement specialist (for school‑bus camera enforcement), K‑9 and medical expenses, and a modular building to provide detention/office space.
Discussion highlights - Taser funding: Commissioners and the sheriff discussed whether taser replacement dollars should come from local asset forfeiture funds or from the general fund. The sheriff argued that equipping deputies is the county’s responsibility; some commissioners preferred keeping the equipment purchase within asset forfeiture (drug forfeiture) so general revenues would not be diverted. No final formal appropriation was recorded in the work session minutes;…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

