Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Licensing And Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alcohol beverage office warns of paperwork and enforcement strain if proposed state bills pass
Summary
County Alcohol Beverage Board staff told commissioners new state bills (beauty-salon and ‘art establishment’ licenses) would increase licensing workload and enforcement demands; staff asked for flexibility in hours for an administrative assistant and signaled plans for a five-year revenue plan to recover administrative costs.
Tammy Hildebrand, director of the county’s Alcohol Beverage Control office, told commissioners at the March 14 work session that two pending pieces of state legislation could create significant additional local workload and enforcement responsibility beginning July 1.
Hildebrand said the proposed bills — which received favorable committee reports at the time of the meeting — would broaden the types of establishments eligible for licenses (including nail/beauty salons and broadly defined “art establishments”) and could add many new licensees statewide. She warned enforcement would become more complex because the traditional three-tier model (manufacturer, distributor, retailer) is blurring as manufacturers seek retail activities, and because licensing categories would expand and overlap with state licenses.
Hildebrand asked the commissioners to approve increasing her administrative assistant from 20 to 30 hours per week to handle higher renewal-season workload, and she proposed a five-year plan to increase administrative fees and reclassify licenses so fees better cover program costs. She said most Maryland counties already charge administrative or filing fees and that Saint Mary’s County is one of the few that historically has not. Commissioners and Hildebrand discussed alternatives such as staggered renewal dates and grace periods to reduce administrative spikes at renewal time.
The Alcohol Beverage board also said the preliminary fiscal analysis used to justify the assistant-hours increase did not include additional enforcement staffing that would be required if the bills pass; Hildebrand said enforcement staffing needs would be harder to quantify until the legislature acted and the local impacts were clearer.
Commissioners asked staff to continue monitoring legislation and to provide details on revenue-model options, administrative fee structures and enforcement needs in the next budget packet.
