Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners oppose bill that would lower county borrowing cap; keep CIP projects pending delegation decision
Summary
After lengthy capital-project discussion, commissioners decided to leave previously approved CIP priorities in place while awaiting the state delegation's decision on additional bond authority and voted to send a letter opposing legislation that would reduce county borrowing authority from 2% to 1.8%.
Commissioners reviewed the capital-improvement program and the county's bond-authority situation at the March 7 work session and expressed strong reluctance to reopen long-set project priorities while the county awaits the state delegation's action on additional borrowing authority.
Finance staff said the current CIP package totals roughly $54.4 million across public facilities, highways, land conservation, parks acquisition and school projects; staff noted some projects are bond-funded and others rely on grants and transfer taxes.
Several commissioners argued that pulling or reprioritizing projects now would create uncertainty for contractors and the public and urged staff to leave the CIP package intact for the planning commission hearing and to await the delegation's April decision. The county also discussed alternatives should borrowing authority be withheld, including increasing local taxes and fees — a scenario staff described as raising the income tax to the statutory maximum or increasing the property tax rate — or deferring projects.
On related state policy, commissioners discussed Senate Bill 737 (House Bill 1055), a proposal to reduce counties'maximum borrowing authority (the bill would lower a commonly used 2 percent threshold to 1.8 percent for county calculations). Commissioners voted to direct the county administration to write a letter opposing SB 737 and the corresponding House bill; the motion carried on a voice vote in the work session with one commissioner recorded as opposed.
Staff said they would finalize the CIP package for the Monday planning-commission packet, leave current project priorities in place pending the delegation's action, and continue to model budget alternatives in case additional borrowing authority is not provided.
