Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retiree Health Elected Officials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Mary's County to study extending retiree health vesting for elected officials; military-service credit set aside for later analysis
Summary
County commissioners asked staff for a fiscal analysis on widening retiree health vesting to all local elected offices and whether prior officeholders should be made eligible; the question of counting military service toward health vesting was separated for a later, deeper review.
County commissioners asked staff to produce more detailed cost estimates before deciding whether to extend retiree health vesting for St. Mary's County elected officials and whether that extension should apply to prior officeholders.
At a March 2 budget work session, staff told the commission they had hired Bolton to prepare a fiscal note that will analyze extending the benefit to the 11 elected positions the county identified and to provide options on retroactivity and eligibility. Katherine, a county staff member, said Bolton will deliver analysis to the commissioners next week.
The request before the commissioners included two distinct questions: (1) extend the retiree health vesting schedule to all 11 local elected positions; and (2) whether to count up to five years of military service in vesting for retiree health. Commissioners agreed not to conflate the two. Several commissioners said the military-service question needs more time and a separate analysis because state retirement rules already treat military service differently for pensions.
Commissioners also discussed whether any change should be retroactive to prior elected officials who are still living. One commissioner said prior officeholders who are alive should be considered for inclusion; other commissioners pressed for options showing the fiscal impact of retroactivity and the time horizon such retroactivity would affect.
Staff and commissioners discussed how the proposed subsidy schedule for elected officials compares with county employees’ current subsidies. County staff presented a chart showing proposed elected-official subsidies such as a 75/25 split after two terms and an 80/20 split after three terms, which several commissioners described as comparatively generous versus typical county-employee vesting that phases in more slowly.
Because the commission requested additional details, the prior motion on the matter was left tabled pending receipt of Bolton’s fiscal analysis and further information staff will gather in a state benefits administrator call planned the same afternoon. Commissioners asked staff to include cost scenarios showing (a) the impact of making changes going forward only and (b) the impact if the county applied retroactivity to living former officeholders.
Next steps: staff will return with Bolton’s fiscal note and additional information about the state retirement rules and the cost and scope of retroactive inclusion. No formal change to policy or benefits was adopted at the March 2 session.
