Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City attorney briefs Planning & Zoning Board on Sunshine Law, penalties and public-record rules
Summary
The City Attorney gave the board a 40-minute overview of Florida's Sunshine Law, covering when meetings are considered public, limits on member communications, public-records obligations and criminal/civil penalties for violations.
The City Attorney reviewed Florida's Sunshine Law with the Planning & Zoning Board on Jan. 21, saying the law covers any gathering of two or more board members to discuss matters that might come before the board.
The presentation focused on three practical areas: meetings and communications among board members, recording and broadcast rules, and public-records obligations. The attorney said the law applies to formal and informal gatherings and to communications by phone, e-mail, text, social media or third parties.
Why it matters: Violations can void board actions and carry criminal and civil penalties. The attorney told the board that a public officer who knowingly violates the Sunshine Law may face a second-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail and other penalties, and that civil penalties and attorney'fee exposure also are possible. He noted a Nov. example in which a mosquito control district paid about $520 in fines and costs for a noncriminal violation.
Key guidance presented to the board included: - Substantive discussions about foreseeable board action must occur at a properly noticed public meeting; members must avoid deliberations or seeking concurrence outside public sessions. - Members may request factual information from staff individually, but staff cannot serve as a conduit for member-to-member communications about board business. - Recording devices and photographing meetings are permitted unless they are unreasonably disruptive; broadcasts are allowed. - Public records include e-mails, text messages, photographs and many other formats; members should not delete messages that could be subject to public-records requests.
Board members asked practical questions during the Q&A about abstentions, decks and building definitions and the interplay with public-records requests. The City Attorney emphasized that if a court finds a Sunshine Law violation the decision becomes void ab initio unless the board cures that error by a full public hearing and independent final action.
The session ended with members thanking the attorney and asking staff follow-ups on narrow procedural points. No formal board action was taken.
