Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works Paving topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Troy council approves 2025 paving program contract authorization up to $1.5 million

2138373 · January 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On Jan. 21 Troy City Council adopted Resolution R5-2025 authorizing the Director of Public Service and Safety to advertise for bids and enter into a contract for the 2025 paving program at a cost not to exceed $1,500,000.

Troy City Council on Jan. 21 adopted Resolution R5-2025 authorizing the Director of Public Service and Safety to advertise for bids and enter into a contract for the 2025 paving program at a cost not to exceed $1,500,000.

The Streets and Sidewalks Committee reported Jan. 13 on the proposed 2025 paving program, which includes a list of roadway sections attached to the committee report. Mr. Phillips read the committee recommendation and described the recommendation that staff proceed with bidding and contracting under the $1.5 million authorization.

Council moved to suspend the rules and adopt R5-2025; the motion to suspend the rules was made by Mr. Phillips and seconded by Mr. Twist. The motion to adopt the resolution was moved by Mr. Witten and seconded by Mr. Sievert. The roll call on adoption recorded all present council members voting yes; two members had been excused earlier in the meeting.

Staff will advertise for bids and return to council with contract award details. The resolution authorizes bid advertisement and execution of a contract up to the $1.5 million cap; specific contractor selection and contract terms will be determined through the competitive bidding process and brought back to council as required by city procurement rules.

Votes at a glance R5-2025 (2025 paving program authorization): motion to suspend rules — moved by Mr. Phillips, seconded by Mr. Twist; motion to adopt — moved by Mr. Witten, seconded by Mr. Sievert; outcome: adopted (unanimous among members present).