Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters raise concerns about roadside signage, park consolidation, downtown shelter location and request EIS for salt mine
Summary
During the committee’s public comment period on Jan. 13, residents urged county attention to visual clutter from driveway and billboard signage, proposed consolidating county park services, questioned shelter placement in the city center, and asked legislators to seek an environmental impact statement regarding a salt mine/Cargill permit matter.
Two members of the public addressed the committee during the Jan. 13 public comment period with separate topics: roadside signage and landscape protection; park consolidation and shelter siting; and a request for county legislative support to press for an environmental impact statement related to a salt mine permit.
Signage and landscape protection
A native Ithacan (identified in the transcript as a resident who said she has appeared before the committee previously) told the committee she is concerned about increasing numbers of driveway signs and billboards that block views of wildflowers and trees on routes including Coddington Road and state routes 30 and 366. She said she met with county staff (named Randy and Veronica in the transcript) and expects to share further research at a future meeting. She called for community coordination similar to past efforts to curb billboard proliferation.
Parks consolidation and shelter location
Amanda Kirchgesner urged a broader definition of "environmental quality," saying the county should plan shelter locations outside the city center so people experiencing homelessness can begin reintegrating without the distractions of the downtown neighborhood. She also proposed exploring consolidation of park services across municipalities to create dedicated staff, access larger funding sources, and achieve more regenerative landscape management; she suggested Cornell University as a potential collaborator.
Salt mine / Cargill concerns and EIS request
Brian Eaton (appearing by Zoom) summarized a history of public requests for environmental review around a salt mine (Cargill was discussed in later committee comments and public commentary). Eaton outlined past interactions with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) on permit renewals and described an enhanced environmental assessment produced without public scoping, limited public access to documents, and contested trade‑secret claims. Eaton asked the legislature to consider taking up a member‑filed resolution requesting an environmental impact statement (EIS) or formal public process; he said municipal and state legislators have historically supported the request and asked the committee to provide a seat at the table for public interest input.
Why it matters: Public commenters raised quality‑of‑life and process‑transparency concerns that feed into the committee’s planning, environmental quality and watershed work, especially where private operations intersect with public water resources.
Ending: Chair Annie thanked the members of the public for their comments and staff indicated they had discussed follow‑up actions or would accept further information by email.
