Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Quality topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fort Lauderdale expands recreational water monitoring; staff weigh signage, sourcing and outreach

2138264 · January 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public Works described expanded testing at recreational waterway sites, the new chief waterways officer search, options for bacterial-source testing, and the limits and trade-offs of public signage for elevated bacteria levels.

City resilience and public works staff described the city's recreational waterway monitoring program, the addition of monitoring sites, signage and real-time online data, and debated additional steps such as targeted source-tracing tests and public signage strategy.

Dr. Nancy Gassman said the city currently monitors about 13 sites on a weekly basis for bacteria and that Miami Waterkeeper was testing 11 sites; the city has added monitoring at marinas and other key recreational entry points. "We have sites monitoring sites in every 1 of those locations," she said of designated water-sport areas.

Signage and public communication: Staff said the city has placed signage and QR codes at monitoring sites that points users to the Swim Guide real-time data. City staff cautioned that posting frequent warning signage could have unintended reputation effects and might drive recreational users to neighboring jurisdictions with less monitoring. As Dr. Gassman said: "The caution I would have for the commission is that the City of Fort Lauderdale is leading in this area in terms of providing monitoring of our recreational waterways. ... I don't think we want to be driving people out of our community, but I think we want to make sure that they have an understanding of the water quality on any given day."

Source tracing and actionability: Commissioners and staff debated targeted microbial source-tracking (to identify whether bacteria is human, canine, bird, or other). Staff cautioned that such tests are expensive and may not always yield an actionable remedy: if bird or iguana waste is the dominant source, local remediation options are limited. Commissioner comments emphasized that if a test returns a human-sourced signal it triggers different follow-up actions, such as reviewing piping and INI (inflow and infiltration) near outfalls.

Chief Waterways Officer: Staff said the city is hiring a Chief Waterways Officer to coordinate policy and monitoring across the 165 miles of waterways within city limits; HR had screened candidates and planned interviews.

Significance: Commissioners asked staff to continue expanding monitoring at highly used recreation sites, consider targeted source-tracing where it could lead to remediation (e.g., identifying and fixing sanitary INI), and return with options for signage that balance public information and reputational effects. Staff said the city will continue to publish Swim Guide real-time data and to work with community recreational groups and boating interests on outreach and compliance.

Ending: Staff flagged the need for a dedicated waterways leader and said that any expansion of regular source-tracing would be selective because of cost and the need for an actionable response once sources are identified.