Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Accountability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

New Virginia accountability model: district staff outline weighted index, growth and readiness measures

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Curriculum and testing staff walked the board through Virginia’s new accountability model (mastery, growth, readiness), explained the Ready for Life framework and recommended ASVAB testing for all juniors; district data translated to preliminary ‘on track’ ratings for most schools.

Franklin County School Board members received an overview Jan. 13 of Virginia’s updated accountability system, which uses a weighted index of mastery, growth (elementary/middle), and readiness (high school) indicators.

Model summary Assessment director Cara Bernard and testing staff described the structure: mastery measures SOL performance (reading, math, science) with extra weight for students scoring in the “advanced” band; growth measures expected student progress (reading and math) for elementary and middle schools; readiness measures include chronic absenteeism, advanced coursework and a new “Ready for Life” (enrollment, employment, enlistment — 3E) framework at the high‑school level.

Key operational points - Growth: Virginia’s revised growth metric compares each student’s progress against statewide expectations; the model provides partial credit for students who reach expected growth rather than credit only for those who exceed it. - Readiness (high school): includes a new 3E framework. Points are awarded for items such as dual‑enrollment and AP coursework, industry credentials, ASVAB participation and completion of an associate’s degree while in high school. - Chronic absenteeism accounts for a portion of the readiness score; for the current year the performance task tied to the 5‑percent readiness slot is not yet active and absenteeism is counted at a higher weight as a temporary measure.

Preliminary district results Using the most recent SOL and related data, district staff ran the new calculations and reported that one elementary school reached the “distinguished” category and that most district schools fell in the “on track” band; the high school narrowly missed “on track” by less than a point, largely because of chronic absenteeism.

Board reaction and next steps Board members asked detailed questions about the meaning of the growth metric, the effect of advanced course credits, and the new Ready for Life measures. Staff said the district plans to administer the ASVAB to juniors this spring to capture enlistment and career‑readiness credit and will continue to refine local practice to improve chronic absenteeism and advanced‑course opportunities.

Ending Staff said the new model better rewards gains among high‑performing students and provides new readiness measures that align career and college preparation with accountability. The district will track data through benchmarks and report updates as the state finalizes performance‑task definitions.