Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves consent calendar; public and councilmembers press staff for detail on large check-register items
Summary
The Selma City Council approved the consent calendar and the city check register but several councilmembers and members of the public pressed staff for more detail on large payments and reimbursements, including an executive-retreat bill, a quarterly insurance deposit, engineering invoices and vendor reimbursements to a council member.
The Selma City Council approved routine consent items and the check register on Jan. 21 after members pulled several items for discussion and public comment.
Councilmembers removed items b and c from consent for additional review and queried staff about multiple large entries in the check register. Questions from council and the public included a $5,398.51 payment to Tenaya Lodge (described as an executive-team retreat payment), a $471,618 third-quarter insurance deposit, engineering invoices (including a $208,163 Van Horn Engineering bill), and an approximately $30,000 final payment to Willdan for a development-impact-fee update.
Councilmember Avalos also asked about a large line item described as a $123,505.64 payment to Mid Valley Disposal that staff said likely had an incorrect description and would be clarified. Several CalCard transactions (meals and small purchases) drew public attention; residents asked for more pre-meeting backup to explain recurring charges and card usage.
The register also showed a $1,972.54 reimbursement made to outgoing Councilmember Beverly Cho for a senior Thanksgiving luncheon; staff explained the city acted as custodian of donated funds and reimburses expenses with receipts. Members of the public urged future reimbursements be made directly to nonprofit treasurers to avoid appearances of impropriety.
Council action: The council approved the remaining consent items and the check register by roll call. Staff said they would provide more detailed back-up and line-item explanations at the next council meeting and offered to make backup available to council members in advance of payments going to the council for approval.
Why it matters: Large monthly expenditures and one-off reimbursements raise transparency concerns for residents and council members. Staff commitments to provide itemized backups and earlier distribution of supporting documents were central outcomes of the discussion.
