Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the In N Out Site Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff recommends In-N-Out site plan approval with design and landscaping conditions; commission discussion continues
Summary
Staff found the proposed In-N-Out Burger site plan largely in compliance with the Ladera PD overlay but recommended five conditions focused on materials, glazing, landscaping mulch and nonfunctional turf; applicant argued the design meets PDO standards and emphasized brand and community benefits. No formal vote was recorded in the transcript.
Planning staff recommended approval of an In-N-Out Burger site plan in the Ladera subdivision on Jan. 7, but asked the applicant to accept five conditions related to building materials, façade glazing, landscaping mulch and removal of nonfunctional irrigated turf.
Chad, the planning staff presenter, said the proposed one-story, 3,887-square-foot restaurant on a 1.63-acre lot meets many technical requirements (building height, parking, stacking spaces and open space) but differs from the PDO—s design intent in several respects. Staff—s primary concerns were the percentage of primary EIFS (exterior insulation and finish system) on the building frontage, limited first-floor glazing, the prevalence of wood mulch in planting beds, and small pockets of nonfunctional irrigated turf. Staff recommended approval with five conditions to address those items.
Staff asked the applicant to: (1) replace columns and vertical elements with brick or similar durable secondary material, (2) increase glazing on the primary façade to better activate the frontage, (3) swap wood mulch for cobble or another more durable groundcover in planting beds, (4) remove nonfunctional irrigated turf pockets to conserve water and (5) allow staff to work with the applicant on minor outstanding technical comments. Chad cited prior In-N-Out work in Loveland as an example where additional brick and glazing were used to enhance character.
Daniel Pocus, the In-N-Out representative, said the company had designed the site to meet the PD overlay—s technical standards and emphasized brand consistency. He said the company—s architecture includes cornices, recessed panel archways, columns, awnings and a parapet roofline that create the chain—s recognizable look. He told commissioners the proposal meets the PD overlay and discussed store operations, parking, an EV charging space and a drive-through with stacking capacity that exceeds the town—s minimum.
A public commenter, William Welch, program manager for the Ladera project, asked about the interplay between base zoning and the PD overlay and noted differences between the Loveland In-N-Out and the Ladera PDO requirements. Staff responded that the Ladera PDO does not mandate the same brick requirement as Loveland but that staff made recommendations to meet the PD intent for visual interest and consistency.
At the time the transcript ends staff had presented the recommended conditions and the applicant had defended its design. The record does not include a final motion or vote on the In-N-Out site plan; staff indicated it was recommending approval with conditions and further negotiation on specific materials and glazing.
