Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Protest Petitions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate narrows zoning protest thresholds, passes bill to speed some residential development
Summary
Senate File 40, a bill intended to streamline residential development approvals, passed after floor amendments that failed to add neighborhood protections but added a lower threshold for who may file zoning protest petitions.
The Wyoming Senate on Jan. 21 passed Senate File 40, legislation designed to speed approval of certain residential developments by limiting how zoning protest petitions can block local decisions. The bill was amended on the floor and passed by roll call, 29 ayes with 2 excused.
Debate turned on how much discretion to leave to local zoning authorities and whether the bill should explicitly preserve stronger protections for neighborhoods near certain types of facilities. Senator Smith offered a 3rd-reading amendment that listed specific facility types—nuclear facilities, correctional institutions, solid-waste facilities and casinos—as exceptions where the higher existing protest threshold would remain in place. Smith said the change would restore "guardrails" so neighborhoods could block developments that would "destroy this neighborhood" in some cases.
Opponents of that amendment, including Senator Landon, said a state-level laundry list is overly prescriptive and that local zoning boards know their communities best. "I just don't think that those of us down here ought to be involved with my zoning board as to how they wanna handle what they're doing up in my neck of the woods," Landon said. Senator Scott and others said the amendment was a reasonable carve-out to protect residential areas from the most disruptive uses; Scott called the proposed list "a pretty good list." The Smith amendment failed on a voice vote.
Senator Grew then offered a narrowly targeted 3rd-reading amendment that changed the protest-petition language to require "more than 1" signer in certain cases rather than permitting a single landowner to trigger a protest. That amendment was adopted. Supporters said it reduces the ability of a single landowner to halt development while preserving an avenue for adjacent property owners to object.
On final passage the Senate voted to approve Senate File 40. The floor debate ranged from concerns about property rights and local control to calls for guardrails protecting residential areas from particularly disruptive uses. Senate File 40 now has passed the Senate and will proceed through the legislative process.
