Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Taxes And Revenue topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

William Penn SD staff recommend board consider lowering tax collector compensation from $1.75 per bill

2135388 · January 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented three compensation-rate scenarios for tax collectors — $1.75 (current), $1.25, and $1.00 per bill — and said lowering the rate would save $7,351 or $11,000 depending on the option; the recommendation will be placed on next month's agenda for board action.

William Penn SD staff presented three options for tax collector compensation Wednesday and recommended the board consider a lower per‑bill rate at an upcoming meeting.

"Right now, the tax collector's compensation rate is $1.75 per bill," said Doctor Beacotz (meeting host). Staff showed the current expense at that rate is about $25,000. The presentation compared the current rate to a $1.25 per‑bill scenario (estimated expense $18,000; savings $7,351) and a $1.00 per‑bill scenario (estimated expense $14,000; savings $11,000).

"We're in a position to make a recommendation, to the board for action," the presenter said, explaining that the item would appear as a motion on the next month's agenda and that staff had reviewed the three scenarios to be fair to district vendors and taxpayers.

Board members requested comparative data from surrounding districts; a board member asked that staff provide rates used by neighboring districts before the vote. No formal vote occurred at the meeting; staff said the board will consider and could act on a rate at the next regular meeting.

The district noted it also uses a vendor to assist with tax bill collection; the compensation figures are tied to the number of bills by borough and the selected per‑bill rate. Staff framed the item as a potential, modest operating‑expense reduction as the district prepares budget options for 2025–26.