Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Animal Health Regulation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House bill to allow chiropractors to treat animals draws mostly favorable testimony

2135151 · January 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supporters said the bill would let veterinarians or chiropractors who complete a nationally recognized animal-chiropractic program treat animals without a veterinary referral; proponents argued it improves access and affordability, while opponents raised standards concerns in prior sessions.

Representative Diane Kelly introduced House Bill 267 to authorize doctors of chiropractic and doctors of veterinary medicine who complete a nationally recognized animal chiropractic program to adjust animals without a veterinary referral and, for chiropractors, without direct veterinary supervision.

Kelly said the bill is essentially the same as language the Legislature passed in the prior session but that the governor vetoed, and that the new draft clarifies eligibility by explicitly limiting the exemption to licensed veterinarians and licensed chiropractors who complete the named training. She told the committee veterinarians and chiropractors already attend nationally recognized programs and that granting an explicit exemption is intended to help animal owners obtain timely and affordable care.

Kurt Ehrenberg, New Hampshire state director for The Humane Society of the United States, testified in support, saying the bill would increase access to care and did not raise additional concerns for the organization. Representative Schmidt and committee members asked about training and whether programs include a performance-standard component; Kelly said the programs are nationally recognized and the director of OPLC would determine accepted programs.

Representative Howard reported online sign-in counts: four supporting and one opposing entries for HB 267, while the committee record indicated a broader split on other bills. Representative Kelly said the measure passed both chambers in the previous session but was vetoed by the governor; the revised language aims to resolve the governor’s concerns about explicit eligibility.

Committee members did not take final action; the hearing record was closed and testimony will be included in committee deliberations.